Code Exhibit

To see a dynamic remix of this blogs content:
Blog Remixed by Maerd
Flash 7 plug-in, hi-speed line and Firefox browser recommended. Contribute to this blog and receive source code for maerd on July 30.

ARTISTS

Amy Alexander
Olly

b-l-u-e-s-c-r-e-e-n.net Fiction Cellulaire

David Bouchard
Auto Portrait

Martin Howse
ap0204

Stanza
Time Code

Valid XHTML 1.0!

Powered By Greymatter

Home » Archives » July 2005 » metaphysical ruminations that almost become runny and mystical

[Previous entry: "a question / une proposition"] [Next entry: "open source metaphysics"]

07/15/2005: "metaphysical ruminations that almost become runny and mystical"


It's summer here in Montreal, the weather is hot, most folks are more concerned with swimming than with the metaphysics of open-source systems....thus the code blog advances slowly like a snail drenched in sweat...

But, since water is in the soothing swimming pools, and is also the root chemical underlying organic lifeforms (here in Montreal at least), I find myself pondering some huge simple fundamental questions: what is the source of life itself? what is open?

My pesky mind keeps thinking: How many humans actually have access to the souce of life? Who doesn't?
Is the source of life analogous to a code? Maybe its a fluid, how do you open a fluid?
Is it possible that the source could be both open and immanent and yet somehow normally (for most of us) inaccessible?


Let me clarify why these questions interests me (and how they might vaguely have anything to do with open source code practises) : if the goal and motivation of open source is arising from a desire to basically give, code as gift, there is in this activity the implicit intention to provide a model for a more equitable economic system based upon giving not profit. This is essentially idealism. I feel most humans could agree they would like to see more equitable forms of economic exchange. Most citizens of privileged nations aare of the enormous suffering in the world live with a sense of persistent complicity.
Why?

Essentially my feeling is the human organism has a very limited sphere of reference and cannot consistently conceive of cosmological scale. Our nature induces in us notions of belonging and ownership. Open source practise is perhaps seeded within us by those rare moments when awareness gliimpses the radical heaving fluid of life source...so I feel the mundane day to day debugging open source begins in what is beyond us...in a recognition which is as sweet as a swim in a pool on a hot day....

Replies: 1 Comment

on Sunday, July 31st, b-l-u-e-s-c-r-e-e-n.net said

I don't think that life is a source code, life is temporal, life is a process, life is the expression of the source code of our universe. Is the source code of our universe open? Of course not, and we can easily see for example the creation of physical modelization (relativity, quantum physics, string theory...), the uncoding of DNA or even the research around the understanding of human spirit (psychology, sociology...) as reverse engineering approach to increase our own understanding of our source code. But anyway I am not sure that to know if our source code is free or not is the first question... Try to imagine an universe based on a free source code. Are someone here able to understand (at least to have a global view of) the source code of a complex system as our universe? Is it possible to access (and eventually to modify) a source code when your own life is a result of this code? (So in the certain way include inside this source code).